Posts Tagged ‘ Islam ’

Mosques Flourish in America; Churches Perish in Muslim World

by Raymond Ibrahim

Pajamas Media
March 3, 2011

 

 

 

As Muslims prepare to erect a mega-mosque near the site of the 9/11 atrocities, it is well to reflect that the sort of tolerance, or indifference, that allows them to do so, is far from reciprocated to churches in the Muslim world. I speak not of Islamist attacks against churches—such as the New Year attack in Egypt that killed 21 Christians; or when jihadists stormed a church in Iraq, butchering over 50 Christians; or Christmas Eve attacks on churches in Nigeria and the Philippines. Nor am I referring to state-sanctioned hostility by avowedly Islamist regimes, such as Iran’s recent “round up” of Christians.

Rather, I refer to anti-church policy by Middle East governments deemed “moderate.” Consider: Kuwait just denied, without explanation, a request to build a church; so did Indonesia, forcing Christians to celebrate Christmas in a parking lot—even as a mob of 1,000 Muslims burned down two other churches. If this is the fate of churches in “moderate” Indonesia and Kuwait—the latter’s sovereignty due entirely to U.S. sacrifices in the First Gulf War—what can be expected of the rest of the Islamic world?

The best example of anti-church policy is Egypt, where the Middle East’s largest Christian minority, the Copts, lives. During Mubarak’s tenure alone “more than 1500 assaults on Copts have occurred, without any appropriate punishment given to criminals or compensation to the victims,” says Coptic Solidarity.

For starters, Egypt’s state security has a curious habit of disappearing right before Coptic churches are attacked—such as in the aforementioned New Year attack. They also tend to arrive rather late after churches are attacked: it took security “hours” to appear when six Copts were murdered while exiting their church last year. Considering that weeks ago an Egyptian policeman identified and opened fire on Christians, killing a 71-year-old—while yelling Islam’s medieval war-cry, “Allah Akbar!”—none of this should be surprising.

Since the 7th century, when Islam invaded and subjugated formerly Christian Egypt, the plight of churches has been tenuous. The very first condition listed for Christians to obey in order not to be molested in the notorious Pact of Omar—which informs sharia law, “the principal source of legislation” in Egypt—says it all: “We shall not build, in our cities or in their neighborhood, new monasteries, Churches, convents, or monks’ cells, nor shall we repair, by day or by night, such of them as fall in ruins or are situated in the quarters of the Muslims.” Accordingly, in the words of reporter Mary Abdelmassih:

[U]nlike Muslim citizens, who only need a municipal license to build mosques, the Copts require presidential approval for a church … [and] the approval of the neighboring Muslim community. Even after obtaining licenses for a church, Muslims still attack Christians and demolish or burn their churches. A rumor that Christians are meeting to pray is enough reason for Muslim neighbors to carry out acts of violence against them. On various occasions, it only takes Muslims to protest against the building of a church for State Security to stop the works, under the pretext that it is causing “sectarian strife.”

In fact, citing minor building violations, Egypt’s state security recently stormed a partially constructed church in the Talbiya region where over one million Christians live without a single church. In the process, state security fired tear gas and live ammunition on protesters, claiming the lives of four Copts, including an infant (79 were severely injured, 22 blinded or semi-blinded, and 179 detained, including woman and children). One human-rights activist complained that the wounded Copts “were shackled to their hospital beds and then sent to detention camps.”

All this is exacerbated by well-connected Egyptian Muslims who issue fatwas comparing the building of a church to the building of “a nightclub, a gambling casino, or building a barn for rearing pigs, cats or dogs”; or who appear on Al Jazeera ludicrously accusing Copts of stockpiling weapons in their churches and torturing Muslim women in their monasteries.

Incidentally, all this was under the “secularist” Mubarak. As for Egypt’s current power-holders, the military, armed forces just stormed a 5th century monastery, opening fire on monks to chants of “Allah Akbar!” (see video here). Consider the fate of Copts should the Muslim Brotherhood assume power.

Such, then, is the plight of Christians and their churches in the Muslim world—and such is the irony: while mosques, some of which breed radicalization and serve as terrorist bases, start dotting America’s landscape, churches are on their way to becoming extinct in the Middle East, the cradle of Christianity. More pointedly, as America allows Muslims to build a mega-mosque near Ground Zero—which was annihilated by Islamists partially radicalized in mosques—America’s “moderate friends” in the Muslim world blatantly persecute Christians and their churches.

Such flagrant double standards are—or should be—unconscionable. Yet here we are. Is it any wonder, then, that the Western mindset has a long way to go before it understands how to deal with the scourge that is “radical Islam”?

 

http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/mosques-flourish-in-america-churches-perish-in-muslim-world/

Indonesia Denies Forced Religious Conversions

An Indonesian human rights group said however it had recorded 56 cases in West Java province in which soldiers forced Ahmadiyah followers to convert to mainstream Islam. The government denies there have been any forced conversions, saying the military intervention was to protect the Ahmadiyah from more violence.

“As long as their intention is positive — that is to ensure Ahmadiyah followers do not become the target of violence — then that’s not a human rights violation,” said Justice and Human Rights Minister Patrialis Akbar. “It�s not a harmful intervention,” Akbar told reporters.

 

But local rights group Imparsial disputed that, saying soldiers have entered mosques, gathered the sect followers and “forced them to repent and convert to Islam”. There has been an international outcry over the treatment of Ahmadis after an amateur video showed hundreds of Muslim fanatics armed with machetes, sticks and rocks attacking Ahmadiyah followers, leaving three dead.

 

There is also criticism over a decree from some provincial administrations in the world’s most populous Muslim country that prohibited Ahmadis from displaying signs identifying their mosques and schools. “We already checked and there’s no negative element, there’s no coercion whatsoever,” Defence Minister Purnomo Yusgiantoro said.

 

Human Rights Watch has condemned violence against the sect and urged President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono to sack his religious affairs minister for discrimination and to lift the ban on Ahmadiyah practising in public.

 

Ahmadiyah, who differ from orthodox Muslims because they do not believe Mohammed was the last prophet, have been subjected to regular abuse and persecution since their sect was slapped with restrictions at the urging of mainstream Muslims in 2008.

 

Yudhoyono has condemned last month’s attack on the sect but defended a 2008 law banning the Ahmadiyah from spreading their faith, which is used by hardliners to justify attacks on the sect. Indonesia’s constitution guarantees freedom of religion but rights groups say violence against minorities including Christians and Ahmadis has been escalating since 2008. There have been cases of Christians being beaten and churches attacked.

 

http://www.crucibleofterror.org/

Islam and Nazism – Fascist Islam

 

There are parallels between Islam and Nazism that we are taught to ignore because it does not conform with the tolerance level we have all been taught.  Schools have been teaching students for 30 years to be tolerant of others of different religions, races and lifestyles. Some schools have taken the Holocaust out of their curriculum because it offends Muslims. Fascist Islam however is ignored, as are the likenesses between the two ideologies.

 

The Nazi movement was based on the fact that some people were better than others. Led by Adolph Hitler, it operated under the theory that there was a master race of people that could conquer others. This was based on physical appearance. Although he did not fit the bill himself, Hitler wanted a master race of blue eyed blonds. There was no tolerance for anyone who did not fit into this ideal. Fascist Islam also preaches no tolerance for those who are not Muslims. This is one example of the relationship between Islam and Nazism.

 

Like the Nazis, the Jews are the target of Fascist Islam. Unlike Nazism, Christians, Buddhists, Hindus and any other religion that is not Islam are also the target for radical Islamists who are taught, according to the Koran, to exterminate anyone not of their belief. Israel has long since been a thorn in the Middle East and terrorist attacks against the country are not uncommon. Islamic leaders have renounced Israel and do not speak up strongly against the attacks. The President of Iran, a radical Islamic country, has even stated that he wishes to blow the country off the map. Anti Jewish rhetoric and the desire to kill Jews is another parallel to Islam and Nazism.

 

Like the Nazis, Fascist Islam followers prohibit freedom for groups other than their own. In some Islamic countries, other churches are not permitted to exist, as is the case with Saudi Arabia, the worst offender when it comes to Fascist Islam and who operate under the guise of being a friend to the United States. Whereas in western countries, Mosques are welcome, such is not the case in some Fascist Islam countries.

 

Islam and Nazism are very similar to one another, although it is not politically correct to make the comparison in the Western world, especially in the United States and the European Union as most people in these countries have been taught to be tolerant of different beliefs other than their own. Even after the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, when those in Fascist Islam countries were filmed celebrating in the streets, comparisons between Islam and Nazism were considered extremist views. The rhetoric regarding Jews, Christians and westerns that is similar to the rhetoric spawned by the Nazis is ignored and any comparisons to Islam and Nazism are swept under the carpet as Western countries continue to try to make peace with those who are practicing Fascist Islam.

 

Despite terror attacks that still persist today, the West continues to ignore Islamic extremism that urges the extermination of anyone who is not of this faith.

 

Der Islamismus hat den Westen fester im Griff denn je – den linken Intellektuellen sei Dank meint Thierry Chervel.

 

 

Thierry Chervel hat in einem bemerkenswerten Aufsatz darauf hingewiesen, dass es linke Intellektuelle waren und sind, die im Kampf gegen den Islamismus versagen

‘’Die Fälle vorauseilender Unterwerfung lassen sich seit der Fatwa kaum mehr zählen. Die Intendantin der Deutschen Oper Berlin, Kirsten Harms, sagte eine Aufführung des „Idomeneo“ ab … Zwar hatte sich kein Fünkchen des Protests geregt, aber man hatte Harms dazu geraten.

 

… Der Fall des Romans „Das Juwel von Medina“ von Sherry Jones: Der amerikanische Randomhouse-Verlag zog diesen Roman über Aischa, die jüngste Frau Mohammeds, nach einem Gutachten der Islamwissenschaftlerin Denise Spellberg zurück. Martin Rynja, Chef des kleinen britischen Hauses Gibson brachte den Roman doch – und musste zusehen, wie seine Büros in Brand gesteckt wurden. Vor dem Kniefall des Randomhouse-Verlags war der Roman kein Thema. Der „Respekt“, schreibt Malik, schafft sich die Ungeheuer, die er befrieden will. … Die Tabuzone ist seit der Fatwa [gegen Rushdie] also gewachsen.

 

… Der Islamismus hat eine universalistische Spitze, die ihn gefährlicher macht als bloße Xenophobie. Und die Linke kämpft lieber gegen die Dissidenten des Islams als gegen den Islamismus.

 

‘’… Die Linke hat in der Auseinandersetzung mit dem Islamismus ihre Prinzipien aufgegeben. Sie stand für Loslösung von Sitte und Tradition, aber im Islam setzt sie sie im Namen von Multikulti wieder ins Recht. Sie ist stolz, die Frauenrechte erkämpft zu haben, aber im Islam toleriert sie Kopftücher, arrangierte Ehen und prügelnde Männer. Sie stand für Gleichheit der Rechte, nun plädiert sie für ein Recht auf Differenz – und damit für eine Differenz der Rechte. Sie proklamierte die Freiheit des Worts und gerät beim Islam in hüstelnde Verlegenheit. Sie unterstützte die Emanzipation der Schwulen und beschweigt das Tabu im Islam. Die fällige Selbstrelativierung des Westens nach der kolonialen Ära, die von postmodernen und strukturalistischen Ideen vorangetrieben wurde, führte zu Kulturrelativismus und Kriterienverlust.

 

www.tagesspiegel.de

Europäer halten Islam für Religion der Intoleranz

Ein Studie der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung dokumentiert die breite Abneigung vieler Europäer gegenüber dem Islam. Auch der Antisemitismus ist weit verbreitet.

Gegenüber dem Islam herrschen in zahlreichen europäischen Ländern große Vorbehalte. Laut einer am Freitag in Berlin vorgestellten Studie im Auftrag der SPD-nahen Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung erklärte rund die Hälfte der Befragten in acht europäischen Ländern pauschal, der Islam sei „eine Religion der Intoleranz“. Knapp 80 Prozent stimmten der Aussage zu: „Die muslimischen Ansichten über Frauen widersprechen unseren Werten“.

Nach Angaben der Autoren ist eine „gruppenbezogene Menschenfeindlichkeit“ in Europa weit verbreitet. Das betreffe neben islamfeindlichen Einstellungen auch rassistische, antisemitische, sexistische und homophobe Haltungen.

Für die Studie „Die Abwertung der Anderen – Eine europäische Zustandsbeschreibung zu Intoleranz, Vorurteilen und Diskriminierung“ von Wissenschaftlern der Universität Bielefeld wurden 2008 in Großbritannien, Frankreich, Deutschland, den Niederlanden, Italien, Portugal, Polen und Ungarn jeweils rund 1.000 Personen ab 16 Jahren befragt.

Bei Fragen zur Ermittlung antisemitischer Einstellungen stimmte rund die Hälfte der befragten Deutschen und 40 Prozent der Italiener der Aussage zu: „Juden versuchen heute Vorteile daraus zu ziehen, dass sie während der Nazi-Zeit Opfer gewesen sind“. In Polen und Ungarn stimmten dem rund 70 Prozent, in den Niederlanden 17 Prozent der Befragten zu.

Ein Drittel der befragten Deutschen waren der Ansicht, dass es „eine natürliche Hierarchie zwischen schwarzen und weißen Völkern“ gebe. Knapp die Hälfte aller Befragten zeigte sich Überzeugt, dass es in ihrem Land zu viel Zuwanderung gebe. Und ebenso viele wünschten sich ein Arbeitsplatzvorrecht für Einheimische in Krisenzeiten. Allerdings sahen 70 Prozent der Befragten in Zuwanderern auch eine kulturelle Bereicherung für ihr Land.

Als „besorgniserregend“ werteten die Autoren die Aussage, dass die Befragten in allen Ländern mehrheitlich das Gefühl hätten, von Politikern nicht gehört zu werden. Dabei sei das Empfinden politischer Machtlosigkeit maßgeblich für die Bereitschaft, menschenfeindlichen Aussagen zuzustimmen.

Der Aussage „was ein Land am meisten braucht, ist ein starker Mann an der Spitze, der sich nicht um das Parlament oder um Wahlen schert“ stimmten knapp 60 Prozent der befragten Polen, Ungarn und Portugiesen zu. In Deutschland fand diese Aussage mit einem Drittel der Befragten hinter den Niederlanden (23 Prozent) am wenigsten Zustimmung.

WELT ONLINE Umfrage

Welcher Satz stimmt?

Ergebnis Antwort 1: 12%
Der Islam gehört zu Deutschland

Ergebnis Antwort 2: 88%
Der Islam gehört nicht zu Deutschland

12.402 abgegebene Stimmen

(Umfrage 12:54 14.03.2011)

/www.welt.de